ISM-1412 asks that every web browser you use is configured to both ASD's and the browser vendor's hardening guidance, and that where the two disagree on a setting, the more restrictive one applies. In practice that means a written baseline for each browser you allow, pushed out as policy people cannot change (ISM-1585), and reviewed as browsers and guidance change. It is part of the Essential Eight at Maturity Levels Two and Three, built on Maturity Level One's browser rules for ads, Java and Internet Explorer 11.
In plain English:
ISM-1412 applies at every classification ASD marks, from non-classified systems to TOP SECRET. ASD's Essential Eight Maturity Model has the same words at Maturity Levels Two and Three, so it is part of any Essential Eight assessment at those levels.
Defaults are made for everyone. ASD's reasoning: "When web browsers are deployed in their default state, or with an unapproved configuration, it can lead to an insecure operating environment that may allow malicious actors to gain an initial foothold on networks." The browser is where people meet untrusted content all day: links, downloads, sign-in pages and advertising.
The browser now holds the business. Email, files, finance and administration consoles all run in it. ASD's Blueprint says of the browser that "its role as a critical control plane for endpoint security continues to grow" (ASD).
A setting people can change can be talked away. ASD warns that "human users' ability to change the security settings of web browsers can be exploited by malicious actors using social engineering", and its assessment guide adds that people "may tinker with these settings to enable content or change settings when guided to do so by malicious actors" (ASD).
Two sources catch more than one. Each covers settings the other leaves alone. ASD's Blueprint layers its own Edge policy over Microsoft's baseline to enforce "granular controls included in ASD hardening recommendations and other better practice configurations that are not addressed by the baseline" (ASD).
The web browser controls work as a set:
Four user application controls round it out. ISM-1915 asks for approved configurations to be "developed, implemented and maintained", which is the written baseline ISM-1412 needs. ISM-1235 restricts extensions to an organisation-approved set. ISM-1467 asks for the latest release of browsers and their extensions. ISM-2110, added in June 2026, applies ISM-1412's rule to every user application.
| Ask | Look at | Good looks like |
|---|---|---|
| Which browsers are in use? | The software inventory for workstations | Only approved browsers; anything else removed or blocked |
| Which guidance was used? | The approved configuration (ISM-1915) | ASD's and the vendor's guidance named with versions, and the stricter value recorded where they differ |
| Is it applied? | Group Policy results or device management reports, and the browser's own policy page | The baseline enforced on every in-scope device, for every approved browser |
| Can people change it? | A standard user's browser settings | Settings greyed out, marked as managed by the organisation or shown with a padlock (ISM-1585) |
| Are the basics in place? | An advertising test page, a Java test page, Internet Explorer 11's status | No ads, no Java, Internet Explorer 11 disabled or removed and blocked from running |
| Which extensions run? | The extension policy and a report of installed extensions | Blocked by default, an approved list, nothing else installed (ISM-1235) |
| Is it current? | Baseline review records and browser versions | Reviewed since the latest vendor baseline; browsers on the latest release (ISM-1467) |
| What is left out? | The exceptions register | Each relaxation justified, approved, limited to the people who need it and dated for review |
ASD's assessment guide describes the same checks (ASD).
More than one browser. Each needs its own baseline, its own policy templates and its own evidence. A second browser installed for one supplier's website quietly doubles the work, or goes unhardened.
Guidance that is silent. ASD's detailed browser settings are for Edge on Windows; the Blueprint notes that where its policies "are not supported on macOS, Android, or iOS, alternative controls or compensating measures may be required if those platforms are in scope" (ASD). For other browsers and platforms, the vendor's guidance may be the only source; record that, and what you added.
Legacy web applications. Old internal sites that need Internet Explorer or Java are the usual reason a baseline gets weakened. ASD's Blueprint allows Edge's IE mode "Where legacy web applications require IE rendering", using a centrally managed site list, and ASD's assessment guide asks for an application control rule against iexplore.exe because "standard users will still be able to launch Internet Explorer 11, even in Microsoft Windows 11". For Java on an intranet, the guide accepts compensating controls such as "internet-based Java content is blocked via a web content filter."
Ad blocking. An ad-blocking extension must be forced on and locked, or the filtering done on the network. ASD is clear that "built-in settings within web browsers to block pop-ups do not meet the intent of this control."
Friction. Blocked extensions and disabled developer tools generate helpdesk calls. A simple request process for new extensions, with someone who actually assesses them, keeps the allow-list honest. Smaller and larger organisations. A smaller organisation can often standardise on one browser, apply the vendor's baseline and ASD's additions through the device management it already has, and keep a page of documentation; its IT provider usually does the work, so ask them for the baseline and the evidence. A larger one has several browsers, platforms, legacy applications and virtual desktops, and needs a configuration owner, change control and compliance reporting.
The business case. The cost is mostly time: building and testing the baseline, then reviewing it as browsers and guidance change. The management tools are often already licensed. What it buys is a smaller target where staff spend most of their working day, and one of the requirements for Essential Eight Maturity Level Two.
Which of your current licences already provide these? The free coverage check shows which ISM and Essential Eight controls the products you already pay for can reach, in about three minutes. To see ISM-1412 among the other hardening controls, open it in our sample coverage report, or read what an ISM assessment involves.
ISM-1412 is not new: ASD's catalogue records it at revision 6, last updated in December 2023. That release amended it "to recommend that the most restrictive guidance take precedence when conflicts occur", as it did for the matching controls on operating systems, office suites, PDF software and server applications (ASD).
In June 2026, ASD added ISM-2110, "recommending that user applications are hardened using ASD and vendor hardening guidance, with the most restrictive guidance taking precedence when conflicts occur". ISM-1235's extension rule "was expanded to all user applications", and ISM-1467 was "expanded to include extensions for all of the application types listed" (ASD).
In September 2026, ISM-1585 was among the controls amended from "users" to "human users"; ISM-1412's wording did not change (ASD). The Essential Eight Maturity Model still says "users". Our ISM September 2026 summary covers the rest.